VCs and angel investors are distinct but related things; each of these pieces clearly recognizes the importance of both. Still, the different emphasis (more outside money is needed to grow the region, in the first piece; more local money, in the second) is interesting to note. Can they both be right?
The Story Behind Pittsburgh's Revitalization
A ten-part series on Pittsburgh's ongoing revitalization, posted during August and September 2009. Topics include Pittsburgh's livability, the green economy, its gritty attitude, diversity and disparity, politicians and policy, history and institutions, sports, entrepreneurship and the tech economy, and more.
Manifesto for a New Pittsburgh
Recent Comments
Essential Pittsburgh Reading
Pittsburgh: Data and Events
- Steel City Innovation
- UCSUR - The PUB
- PittsburghToday Blog
- PittsburghToday
- New Venturist
- Allegheny Conference Blog (IPO)
- Originate (Talent Blog of the PTC)
- TECHBurgher
- Jobs via the Pgh Tech Council
- Pgh Business Calendar (Networking)
- The Burgh Works
- Pittsburgh Ventures
- I Heart Pgh (Happenings)
- Six Degrees of Pittsburgh (Carl Kurlander)
Pittsburgh Commentary
Pittsburgh Arts and Culture
Pittsburgh Ephemera
Green Pittsburgh
Other People's Money
Posted by Mike Madison on Monday, January 08, 2007 | Tags: | 2 Comments
VCs and angel investors are distinct but related things; each of these pieces clearly recognizes the importance of both. Still, the different emphasis (more outside money is needed to grow the region, in the first piece; more local money, in the second) is interesting to note. Can they both be right?
Comments
Search Pittsblog
About Pittsblog
Updated September 2020:
Pittsblog 2.0 was written by Mike Madison, a law professor at the University of Pittsburgh, from January 2004 through December 2011.
Since then, Pittsburgh-themed essays have appeared from time to time at madisonian.net, on law and technology, and in some of Pittsburgh's classier professional media venues.
Chris Briem of Null Space drops by Pittsblog from time to time.
All opinions expressed at Pittsblog 2.0 are those of their respective authors and of no one (and no thing) else, least of all the University of Pittsburgh.
Pittsblog 2.0 has a motto: "It's steel good in Pittsburgh." Say it aloud, with a Pittsburgh accent.
The View Beyond Pittsburgh
Blog Archive
Header Background
Header background images licensed from (left image) lemonad and (right image) plaskota under Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial - Share Alike 2.0 Generic licenses.
Credits
Copyright 2003-2010 Michael J. Madison - WP Theme by Brian Gardner - Blogger Blog Templates, ThemeLib.com
I don't think they're inconsistent at all. My stats included "OPM" in the venture capital investments in Pittsburgh area firms, but it's rare that you will get outside VC money without at least some local VC as a lead investor. That's even more true of angels. BlueTree has successfully attracted angels from other regions to participate in investments in Pittsburgh companies, but only because BlueTree is here as the lead investor. If you want other people's money, you have to have enough of your own...
I would think a region would want both forms of capital. You need investors that can spot and invest in good ideas. The more the merrier.
Local investors bring high trust, knowledge of local players and markets, and a desire to make something happen locally. Out-of-town investors are not as tied to the local establishment and conventions, and are better able to make connections to additional ideas, technologies, and markets.
In a region like Pittsburgh with a weak history of entrepreneurship, local investors are needed to incubate emerging ideas that may not be ready for prime time. Outside investors are needed to break out of local orthodoxy.