``It's remarkable to see how resilient the people are.''If you are interested, my own comments on a similar theme were in this oped a few years ago: It was twenty years ago today.
The Story Behind Pittsburgh's Revitalization
A ten-part series on Pittsburgh's ongoing revitalization, posted during August and September 2009. Topics include Pittsburgh's livability, the green economy, its gritty attitude, diversity and disparity, politicians and policy, history and institutions, sports, entrepreneurship and the tech economy, and more.
Manifesto for a New Pittsburgh
Essential Pittsburgh Reading
Pittsburgh: Data and Events
- Steel City Innovation
- UCSUR - The PUB
- PittsburghToday Blog
- PittsburghToday
- New Venturist
- Allegheny Conference Blog (IPO)
- Originate (Talent Blog of the PTC)
- TECHBurgher
- Jobs via the Pgh Tech Council
- Pgh Business Calendar (Networking)
- The Burgh Works
- Pittsburgh Ventures
- I Heart Pgh (Happenings)
- Six Degrees of Pittsburgh (Carl Kurlander)
Pittsburgh Commentary
Pittsburgh Arts and Culture
Pittsburgh Ephemera
Green Pittsburgh
the Burgh bandwagon grows
Posted by C. Briem on Tuesday, October 31, 2006 | Tags: | 4 Comments
Now Bloomberg (as in the news service, not the NYC Mayor, though it is his company) has voted for Pittsburgh. See the story Google, Intel, Microsoft Researchers Spur Pittsburgh Startups that ran today. Like all such pieces it captures a lot of big issues that it nowhere near has enough space to treat appropriately. So skipping a lot of the economic development story there, I do have to say I appreciate Max Kings quote at the end..
Comments
Search Pittsblog
About Pittsblog
Pittsblog 2.0 is written by Mike Madison, a law professor at the University of Pittsburgh. Send email to michael.j.madison[at]gmail.com. Mike also blogs at Madisonian.net, on law and technology. Chris Briem of Null Space drops by from time to time.
All opinions expressed at Pittsblog 2.0 are those of their respective authors and of no one (and no thing) else, least of all the University of Pittsburgh.
Pittsblog 2.0 has a motto: "It's steel good in Pittsburgh." Say it aloud, with a Pittsburgh accent.
Comments are moderated.
Subscribe to Pittsblog comments
All opinions expressed at Pittsblog 2.0 are those of their respective authors and of no one (and no thing) else, least of all the University of Pittsburgh.
Pittsblog 2.0 has a motto: "It's steel good in Pittsburgh." Say it aloud, with a Pittsburgh accent.
Comments are moderated.
Subscribe to Pittsblog comments
The View Beyond Pittsburgh
Header Background
Header background images licensed from (left image) lemonad and (right image) plaskota under Creative Commons Attribution - Noncommercial - Share Alike 2.0 Generic licenses.
Credits
Copyright 2003-2010 Michael J. Madison - WP Theme by Brian Gardner - Blogger Blog Templates, ThemeLib.com


Good news for Pittsburgh. If we look at some other cities, it should be only 10-15 years and Pittsburgh will be back in the big leagues. That may sound like a long time but it's not.
- Population statistics -
Pittsburgh : 334,563
Philadelphia : 1,517,550
Phoenix : 1,321,045
San Diego : 1,223,400
I have been looking for entrepreneurial opportunities in Pittsburgh recently and the article makes me feel optimistic.
A bit of perspective:
City of Pittsburgh - 58 square miles
City of Phoenix - 475 square miles
City populations are absolutely meaningless. It is a very inaccurate and useless way to gauge the true size of a city. The metro population is a much more true gauge of a city’s size. Granted the regions listed are still bigger than Pittsburgh, but here’s why it matters – is Jacksonville really the biggest city in FL – really? A metro of a little more than one million compared to the 5 million that call South Florida home… is Columbus really the largest city in Ohio (it’s the third largest metro in the state). Is San Diego really bigger than the Bay area? Are El Paso, Tulsa and Omaha really bigger than Pittsburgh?
San Diego - 72.7 square miles.
Philadelphia - 135 square miles.
So Pittsburgh, PA should still be able to do good. We just need to give it time.